From: g woodall
Date: 15 Nov 2005
Time: 17:25:03 -0800
Remote Name: 68.166.235.184
One last (? speculation: Since you apparently were not contacted by the MRO, it is possible that this was a test where an "MRO" is listed on the Custody Control Form but simply as the default approach, even though no MRO actually functioned as part of this particular service package. In this situation, the raw results would be provided to the employer, and this is the norm where there is no MRO interpretation. I feel lobbying should be done to encourage true MRO processing for ALL forensic drug screening.